I really wanted to title this post differently….but then, aware that religious sentiments run high, I thought it would be better to take a safer route
Actually, I wanted to rave and rant about this observation by Bombay High Court judges P B Majmudar and Anoop Mohta , that “Married women should be like goddess Sita” . This humble ‘observation’ was passed when a woman refused to move to Port Blair with her husband. Obviously, concerns like her having a job of her own or even her apprehensions on moving to a remote place never occurred to the esteemed judges. But yes, how un-Sita like of the woman for refusing to walk mutely behind her husband and follow him like the little proverbial sacrificial lamb!!
Not done I tell you!!
It was rather difficult for me to control the expletive-ridden tirade that came to my mind as soon as I read the article. Mark, I’m not in favor of the woman who agreed to the divorce. Surprisingly it never occurred to the judges that the husband in this picture, sent a divorce notice to his wife because ‘she refused to join him in his new place’. Was her refusal so earth-shattering that the man had no option left, but to deny their child a parent??
Aren’t there men who leave their wives behind, to look after ‘his family’ while they go off to far-flung places? Should such women send an immediate divorce decree to their husbands for leaving them behind?? Aren’t women who demand to stay with their husbands (and not their in-laws) looked down upon?
Needless to say, the man was let off easily, apparently because the judges likened him to Bhagwan Ram (he’s a man, after all, isn’t he?!!)!
The woman is the guilty party here. The judges shake their collective heads and rue that today’s women are so unlike Sita. Thanks, but no Thanks!
Sita never got an iota of love and respect for all her sacrifices. I doubt many people (and by that I mean women) hold Sita in very high esteem
. At least, I wish her history had been written differently. I wish it was written in a way that Sita would be a role model for women and not for men alone!! Men would, of course, love to have a wife who always follows their wishes, never argues and stays devoted no matter what scum-of-the-gutter the man is.
*Gag*
Sorry, but no. No woman should strive to be Sita. If she does, then there should be rules , the primary one being that her partner should have a modicum of virtues as in Ram.
But when such men are rare, who do the women become Sitas for??









agree a 100%. Very well said
100 likes to this blog post. I so agree on this and you just wrote my mind.
Okay I have a post coming up on this…I saw it today morning and was so so bugged and then got into an argument with the FIL…
I completely agree to what you are saying…Gah to religious sentiments
True. Sita is nothing but a man-made character, possibly made by the same society who wanted to portray women in a very specific role, suitable for patriarchy. High time we got out of these stereotypes!
About men being like Ram….I would rather my man be nothing like Ram. A person who banishes his wife, who has given up her life for him, been with him through thick and thin, just because some lecherous dhobi ‘thinks’ she is ‘impure’ is not my definition of an ideal human being, let alone husband. I indeed hope and wish that such men are rare!
Very well written. I love reading your blogs. One thing about the last couple of lines bothered me. – “the primary one being that her partner should have a modicum of virtues as in Ram.”
As I understand Ramayana – Ram was a just ruler – a model son – a model brother – a model king but according to me a far from model husband. I wouldn’t want a husband who decides to banish his pregnant wife, just to please his subjects (in today’s world the people around him) after having her walk thru fire to prove her and then decides to take her back a
then which god should men model per our high court?
exactly!! Which God indeed
Finally a feminist post
, Ducks
I am no Ram, but I’m Srihari, ducks again
Feminist??
Ummm…not so much.
Realist? YES!! I am